A New Science

Preface

Hello, dear scientists. My articles herby are used to describe my thoughts of a truly strange nature. I am very sorry if my thoughts offend any of you in any way. Before I begin I would like to say a couple of things. Firstly I believe in a very respectful manner that a theory cannot be derived from a formula but must be carefully thawed out from pure theoretical logic. Secondly I do not think that a theory can be brought about from experimental data, it is the theory that makes predictions not experimental data that predicts a theory otherwise it is just a result.

In the present articles I base my ideas on previous works done by Hugh Everett and Albert Einstein to give them a concrete superstructure. I again apologize for any theories of presently competing scientists that I will dislodge or try to prove wrong in my process of an explanation of the cosmos and their inner workings. I derived my conceptual ideas through pure logistical thought and although I have no formulas to back them up I say you look beyond the math and see the potential.

The Universe, From Birth to Death

Before I begin explaining anything I would first like to present an idea of complete absurdity and craziness that I believe in strongly because of its pure logic: every inertial object leaves a trail of vibrating energy in parallel universes created at the same time as the big bang. This vibrating energy spreads amongst all dimensions including the sub-spaces of time (see below). Now, a widely accepted model of the universe explains that galaxies formed from areas that became slightly denser than others and began halting expansion causing matter to come together. There are other theories, other explanations, but I have yet to find one that suits my heart and the heart of logistical formality, so here is an idea that I propose in the most respectable of ways.

Imagine we freeze time and look at the universe just before the explosion of the Big Bang. The laws that work at this exact period are stated below…

Velocity of an object in that confined system≈0

Density of that system≈∞

Entropy of that system≈∞

Gravitational strength of that system (spacetime curvature) ≈∞

Volume of that system≈0

Space of that system≈0

Temperature of that system≈∞

Time Flow≈0

…The idea simply shows that a Planck time after the explosion or even simultaneously with the explosion of the Big Bang trillions or even close to infinite numbers of universes parallel to our own started up as the vibrating energy trailed off to start new worlds! And, as nothing in our universal world of universes is exactly alike some of the parallel universes streamed off in development quicker than our own. When the stars in the parallel universes were able to become black holes many of them did opening white holes in our universe (I’ll get into this in a later chapter). The white holes released great amounts of energy forming galaxies and stars. This way our universe caught up to the parallel universes which halted in development as they distributed some of their energy to our universe, this way our universe caught up while the others halted in development. Then our universe developed more and sent black-white hole systems to create equilibrium amongst all of the parallel universes! This explains why the center of every galaxy glows white hot. There is a white hole in the middle of every one of them.

The laws I stated above the previous paragraph show that if a singularity is reached than an explosion will be imminent due to the infinite amount of entropy. So the Big Bang occurred because the universe became singular! Roger Penrose’s remark that all black holes contain a singular core should then be proven wrong. Now, what about the second law of thermodynamics? It clearly explains that entropy in the universe will always increase leading scientists to believe that in the beginning the universe was highly organized. Logical evidence suggests otherwise, the laws I stated show that the universe exploded because it became a singularity and reached infinite entropy. This shows that the universe started at maximum entropy and is now decreasing in entropy as its volume grows and temperature drops.

As predicted by Hugh Everett, “the universe will end at almost absolute zero as time would freeze and motion would seize. The objects in the universe would then develop superconductivity and begin sticking together” (even objects from parallel universes I believe). Eventually the density, temperature, and entropy would rise to infinity and a new system of wholesome universes will explode into life! Here are the laws of the universe at its death bed…

Velocity of an object in that confined system≈0

Density of that system≈0

Entropy of that system≈0

Gravitational strength of that system (spacetime curvature) ≈0

Volume of that system≈∞

Space of that system≈∞

Temperature of that system≈0

Time Flow≈0

Of Dimensions and “Forces”

As Einstein had perceived there is only one dimension of time and three dimensions of space generating a four-dimensional spacetime. A more consistent number of total dimensions; five, (not counting the two sub-spaces of time) seem generally more stable (at least to me, I am not forcing anyone to believe me just expressing my view-point). I believe it should be 3space+12time+1unknown dimensions. Time would have two sub-spaces called past and future which unravel as the present passes into and through them. This happens because truly past and future are aspects of the very same thing-the present. The future sub-space will unravel when it becomes the present and the present becomes the past. If this is all true then if an object such as you or me or anything is accelerated at the speed of light and space contracts and time dilates then the future sub-space will also contains a space contraction and time dilation (writings of Akasha). These extra spaces allow for time travel! The unknown dimension could be anything; it could be a dimension through which movement into parallel universes is traversed, or it could be a dimension created at the center of a black hole (remember no singularities), or it is a dimension of absolute nothingness as said by G. Shipov. One more thing…I think that mass creates all of the forces at the same time. One curvature of spacetime induced by the mass of let’s say a planet will within itself contain all four fundamental interactions. If any one of the fundamental interactions (nuclear strong and weak, gravitational, or electromagnetic) should be “made” then within itself coincide all of the other interactions!

Einstein showed that gravity was not a force but a crater in spacetime induced by the mass of an object. (I think that density also plays a role here. Let's say we take two balls of different materials each equally massed to the other. The one with the greater density should have a larger spacetime crater.) If this is so how do physicists still have any hope of unifying relativity theory with quantum mechanics? How can you combine a force and curvature of spacetime? If it is anything that I must list in these groups of ideas is that I do not truly know if their ideas are true, my heart just carries me forward. Well, I think that nature wouldn’t complicate herself because nature always takes the path of least resistance so I would think that electromagnetism and the nuclear forces aren’t forces at all but are curves in spacetime. Logic tells me that in a large enough magnetic field you can see a beam of light curve! Although I cannot myself test this if scientists tried this experiment I bet that light would curve.

Cosmic Energy Pumps

Before anything is discussed about the nature of black and white holes I must first suggest a proposition suggesting their inner workings and purpose in the universe. First of all I think that the only wall between our universe and the parallel universes next to us is spacetime. This means that if a positive curvature is induced in our universe then a negative one is shown to the people living in the parallel universes (50% universe have anti-matter properties). So, if a black hole opens in our universe in the one next to us a white hole is brought to life! These systematic pumps cycle energy throughout the whole system of universes acting sort of like plumbing except for the cosmos. The laws listed in, “The Universe, From Birth to Death,” also work but, slightly differently. I must say that a black hole will never reach a singularity; if it does then it will immediately explode.

The core of the star that formed a black hole sinks deep into spacetime as its density grows (never reaching infinity; the point where a singularity might be reached should be called the critical density just like critical mass. At this point an explosion will happen I guarantee it! It would be as if Uranium 235 in an atomic bomb reached critical mass!). The pressure exerted on this star would be so massive that the core would actually change mediums and become a quasi-liquid of incredible viscosity (this quasi-liquid may have a very high superconductivity and will have such a viscosity that if you would pour some on your hands it would pass through your pores!!). I will list the laws of these cosmic pumps next and give thorough explanations of their predictions and contradictions (these laws are for singularities)…

Velocity of an object in that confined system≈0

Density of that system≈∞

Entropy of that system≈∞

Gravitational strength of that system (spacetime curvature) ≈∞

Volume of that system≈0

Space of that system≈0

Temperature of that system≈∞

Time Flow≈0

…These laws show many things exactly equal to those I predicted to be functioning in the universe singularity. But you cannot even try to compare the universe singularity and one of a black-white-hole system. The universe singularity about at the time of explosion should have been all energy-the purest kind. There all matter is turned into energy. Yet, these laws do not perfectly work inversely for the white hole…

Velocity of an object in that confined system≈>C

Density of that system≈0

Entropy of that system≈0

Gravitational strength of that system (spacetime curvature) ≈-∞

Volume of that system≈→lim

Space of that system≈∞

Temperature of that system≈0

Time Flow≈∞

...These laws show (it is already known) that technically C is the cosmic speed limit and that if traveled at speed C time will should stop to zero just as it would at velocity 0. But, if you were to accelerate at a speed faster than light speed you would travel backwards in time-time would dilate negatively. If we take Einstein’s thought experiment-the one in the train-and modify it so that the train moves at hyperluminal velocities and we look into the mirror we would see our reflection before the photons ever reached the mirror’s surface (which they never could, but do since they go forward and time and the Tachyon-like speeds of the train carry it backwards through time causing an imminent collision in the strangest of ways).

If objects which handle within themselves positive energy and curve space negatively then it is time for a new concept! For every release positive energy there is a negative spacetime curvature and this law works inversely. Hot and cold can be said to be positive and negative energies; so if you have a very hot object exactly the same in every way to another (except of temperature) it would be more massive. Look at it this way…let us say you got water and you cool it until it becomes ice-the cooling process is a form of negative energy in a way so you have two vectors going against each other (Look at Fig.1). If the Sun were to explode the immense heat would curve spacetime so much more that the 4 inner planets would be pushed toward the sun and the explosion wave! The concept I have listed can be reinforced by a special chart…

Sub-luminal Speed	Speed of Light	Speed of Tachyons
Negative spacetime curvature	0 spacetime curvature	Positive spacetime curvature
Positive amount of energy	0 inertia	Negative amount of energy
Time flow proportional to flow of negative time of Tachyon	0 time flow for Photon or any object at this speed	Time flow proportional to flow of positive time of sub-luminal object

…Well now how about that!! If an object has no inertial mass then it cannot bend spacetime! Ohh, another law. Now this law cannot function if I use it with forces, which means that my previous proposition can be reinforced. There are no forces, just curves in spacetime. If everything I have stated above is true then I can conclude that Dark Matter isn’t matter at all! What happens is in a parallel universe you have a body releasing negative energy creating a positive curvature on their end while there is a negative curvature on our end so a gravitational pull could come from a spot in our universe where no mass is present! Since about 90% of our universe is “Dark Matter” it must mean that in the parallel universe creating the positive/negative curvatures affecting our universe has to have about 90% matter and only 10% “Light Matter!” I call it light matter because they (people in the other universe) should name it totally opposite of ours. I don’t know if this is correct or totally stupid but it’s an idea!

Time

I have been very fond of Doctor N.A. Kozyrev’s findings in experimental studies of time. To reinforce his statements I would like to say that time really does have a speed! We can firstly conclude this from Kozyrev’s findings or look at Einstein’s Twin Paradox. We all know the paradox so I won’t go into detail. The spaceship accelerates to light speed and time dilates. The reason time dilates is because the object it dilates for is getting closer to the speed of time! It works the same with light and sound! Think about it. “Time is a transmission of energy without inertia,” a phrase said by Kozyrev after which followed the phrase, “so it must appear everywhere simultaneously!” Judging by the others laws I have deduced, time cannot bend space just as light can’t! This shows us an intimate relationship between the two.

Kozyrev also did many experiments to prove that the ether was real and indeed I believe it is regardless of the Michelson-Morley experiment. Kozyrev’s experiments showed that by vibrating, heating, or spinning an object can have an effect on its mass. I think that by rotating it clockwise you drive it into the fabric of spacetime like a screw causing its mass to become larger (only a bit larger for that matter). If however you put a counterclockwise spin on the object the mass should decrease!

Side Notes

I think that light is not energy! This is because a mass less object doesn’t bend spacetime, therefore it cannot move and it cannot emit any sort of energy. Since it cannot move without curving space and it cannot do that; it follows curves of “dark matter” and other nearby bodies. Let see if you do not believe let’s take a thought experiments…Take a laser system with zero mass and press the button: there is no way any photons will be emitted (or any energy of any kind). This means that light isn’t energy but is simply a carrier of energy which it receives from a certain source!
Because, let’s say in a nuclear explosion as I think all four “forces” are created (just as with any other singled out interaction) all matter turns to light and because of the four fundamental interactions taking place it would seem to me that light is a great feature of spacetime curvature itself.
I have not listed this but I truly believe there could be no motion without the warping of spacetime. In a flat space nothing can move because no interactions would be created. Flat space is our universe’s death, when its temperature reaches a bit above absolute zero! So for all of you believers that light can warp space isn’t true! Light simply follows “dark matter” trails of negative curvature and the curvature of nearby bodies. Motion by spacetime curvature works like this. An object induces a local warping of spacetime but since the warping must always stay constant the warping snaps back into place creating an opposite slightly negative energy pushing the object in the opposite direction like a rubber band.
As for my idea of No-Motion-Without-Warping space I have found a way to prove it! In the lab light was stopped to almost zero miles per hour with a Bose-Einstein condensate. It wasn’t the low temperature that stopped light, but it was the flat space!!! Because, of such low temperatures. What happened is that the local volume became so large that space stretched out causing all curves to disappear-making it flat. Like pulling your pants taut! If you raised the temperature to about that of an explosion of a singularity space would warp so much that you would be sucked toward the explosion!! I think that a Natural Photon (I call it that because it is the photonic particle right before receiving its energy from a source) would have zero degrees Kelvin and therefore not be able to move at all!!! When the energy is given the photon starts to gain mass because by E=mc^2 mass can be transferred into energy. It starts to curve spacetime and accelerate until it goes at C-light speed. As it travels over great distances it uses this energy and begins to slow down a bit a change I predict to be in one of the last digits after the decimal point-this process causes the light to red shift. This means that Hubble’s law and discovery might really be just nothing! Since it took that light so long to come to us it red shifted and lost some energy! This could mean that our universe isn’t even expanding. An electron should have just a bit more energy than an E-Photon (a natural photon which has received its energy from a source). The velocity of any natural photon should equal zero at all times, until it becomes and E-Photon and begins moving!
I think that a tachyon will travel with a in the opposite direction or the applied “force”. This means that if you have a source releasing the tachyon the particle will go back into the source. Also, I think that tachyons have a temperature that is less than that of absolute zero. I know it sounds stupid but it truly is the only way you could have a particle which goes backwards in time, has a speed faster than that of light’s, and induces a positive curvature on the fabric of spacetime.

Epilogue

I am truly sorry if any of my propositions offended any of you so please accept my apology. Remember I am only fourteen years old! If you can please take the time out to think of the concepts I have presented here, even if you think they are stupid and contain nothing of value, but remember Einstein’s words my friends, “Imagination is more important than knowledge!”

Oleg Nashelskiy

14 years old

8^th grade